After the recent surprise arrest of Illinois governor Blagojevich based on a criminal
complaint by US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, state officials and lawmakers are
considering several responses to deal with this situation.
One of the options that has actually been considered even before the current events, is instituting impeachment proceeding against the governor. In June 2008 House Speaker Madigan's office had compiled "Talking Points on Beginning Impeachment Proceedings Against Governor Blagojevich"
The Illinois Constitution , Article 4 Section 14 deals with impeachment :
"The House of Representatives has the sole power to conduct legislative investigations to determine the existence of cause for impeachment and, by the vote of a majority of the members elected, to impeach Executive and Judicial officers. Impeachments shall be tried by the Senate. When sitting for that purpose, Senators shall be upon oath, or affirmation, to do justice according to law. If the Governor is tried, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court shall preside...."
However, the impeachment process would take a long time and cost tens of thousands of dollars. Other possible legal options for removing the governor are being explored. Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, is looking at using both a Illinois Supreme Court rule and a section of the Illinois constitution that deals with Gubernatorial Succession, as potential ways to attempt to have the governor removed :
Illinois Supreme Court Rules, Article III, Civil Appeals Rules, Rule 382 :
The relevant part is, "(a) Institution of proceedings. Proceedings in the Supreme Court when the court has original and exclusive jurisdiction under article IV, section 3, and article V, section 6(d), of the Constitution, which relate to redistricting of the General Assembly and to the ability of the Governor to serve or resume office, shall be instituted by filing a motion for leave to file a complaint, which motion shall be accompanied by the complaint and a brief in support of the motion. The complaint may be supported by affidavits or other pertinent documents.
The relevant section of the Illinois constitution re. Gubernatorial Succession, Section 6 :
(d) The
General Assembly by law shall specify by whom and by what procedures
the ability of the Governor to serve or to resume office may be
questioned and determined. The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to review such a law and any such determination and, in the
absence of such a law, shall make the determination under such rules as it may adopt.
There is also a section of the Illinois Compiled Statutes that may be relevant to these removal efforts: EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (15 ILCS 5/) Governor Succession Act.
"Sec. 1. (a) In the event that the Governor, for any of the reasons specified in Article V, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, is not able to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of his office, such powers and duties of the office shall be exercised by the officer next in line of succession,..."
In addition to following up on legal options provided by these provisions, law makers are also looking at the possibility of changing the law that gives the governor the power to appoint someone o the vacant federal Senate seat. Removal attempts may not prevent him from making the appointment.
The 17TH Amendment to the US Constitution dealing with Senator election and number, states
"... That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct. ..."
The Illinois statute that gives the Illinois governor this power , ELECTIONS (10 ILCS 5/25 8), states:
'When a vacancy shall occur in the office of United States Senator from this state, the Governor shall make temporary appointment to fill such vacancy until the next election of representatives in Congress, at which time such vacancy shall be filled by election, and the senator so elected shall take office as soon thereafter as he shall receive his certificate of election."
However, even if the legislature changes this state law, the governor still has 60 days to decide how to respond to it. Within that time he could still make the appointment under existing law.
Some commentators have speculated that if that happens perhaps the federal Senate could still refuse to recognize the governor's appointee. There does appear to be some language in the federal constitution, Article I, The Legislative Branch, Section 5, Clause 1 has some language that might support such action :
"Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide."
But this may be a slender reed to support the rejection of a legally appointed official.
Despite all the efforts to deal expeditiously with this crisis of confidence in our state executive, it looks like it will probably be "messy" and protracted. Because like former President Nixon, Governor Blagojevich will probably not resign until removal by impeachment is imminent.
*************************************************
Addendum:
See article in which DePaul law professor Len Cavise is quoted re. what it will take to make criminal charges stick against Governor Blagojevich: "Talk is cheap, but it still can be a crime", By Joseph Ryan and Rob Olmstead |